Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of famous people involved in spamdexing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 23:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of famous people involved in spamdexing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article is listcruft, unverifiable, and a probable biographies of living persons violation. SunStar Net talk 22:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Finngall talk 22:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, clearly has issues with WP:BLP. hateless 22:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Malcolmxl5 23:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, violates WP:BLP. Bart133 (t) (c) 00:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Attack page. Blueboy96 21:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per nom and above; a defamation lawsuit waiting to happen. Bearian 21:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as per Bearian cannot be more right. Harlowraman 22:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Somehow I'd think Sublime soul (talk · contribs) should be indefblocked as well ... this is blatant libel. Blueboy96 22:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- He removed the speedy tag that Finngall put on it as well ... I readded it. Blueboy96 22:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.